.:October 2006:.
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        
.:links:.
daily viewing pleasures:
Capitalism Magazine
UnDoubtably Krap
Daily Dilbert Strip
Global Security
Slashdot
Google News
Weather...outside?
The Drudge Report

little blog book:
jubyDOTnet
The Mooch
"Hazel"
Dollars & Crosses
Andrew Sullivan
PseudoPsalms
Sarah's Stuff
Here in Katie's Head
GJ Walberg
Cold Forged
Zach's Random Thoughts
the RANT
miniluv
Delightful Delirium

neither nor:
Homestar Runner
The Intellectual Activist
Page 2 Sports
My Amazon Wish List
Is my Blog HOT or NOT?
Anti-Wil Webring
The Onion

.:Archives:.
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002

.:Search:.


.:Other Sundries:.
listed on:

produced with:

the others of the others:


Personal Essays:
Flagship: Democracy
Healthcare in These United States

October 09, 2005
Sweeter the brew the feeling starts coming back

Here's the continuation from my previous review of the Foo Fighters In Your Honor:

Everything about this album is exactly what you would expect from a great album. It's not trying to hard or struggling for message. It's nostalgic yet feels new. Dave Grohl’s raspy vocals in previous albums may have seemed pushed, but not here. It’s readily apparent that the band approached this album determined to produce a quality record that could define their sound for the ages. And that I suppose is the point.

A great throwback aspect of In Your Honor, it’s a double album; you get the feeling, while listening, that if it were plausible, the two discs would have been made back to back. There is no accidental genius here. The pure energy and egotism of the first disc is wonderfully balanced by the soulful peace one experiences during the second time around.

A lesser band, or even an earlier version of the Foo themselves, would have cut 2-3 songs and attempted a mega-album trying to rearrange the music to make it all fit together. But to their credit, the Foo Fighters just let it go. The separation highlights the differences and embraces each disc's identity. You know the mood you're heading for when you pop them in the CD player, but you don't know where or how it will take you there.

The first disc is most decidedly plugged in. The second reminds us of the best of what acoustic music can be, and was the thing that really sold me. As you groove, content in your musical buzz, your mind naturally wanders to the good times you remember feeling like this, like something out of a Norah Jones song before she won eight thousand Grammys and shone like the sun. Then, bam! It’s Norah Jones grooving a duet with a no longer raspy voiced Grohl. I don’t know of any other potentially great album with this level of dedication to the chill feeling. While this isn’t my favorite album right now, I’ve only had it 2 weeks and it’s climbing up the list fast.

And maybe I won’t know for some time; the real difference between a really good album and a great album is its posterity. If some 14-year old kid can pick up the album in 20 years and fall in love with the music and if it can prompt that kid to pick up other albums of the era and open their eyes to a whole new aural world, then you’ve got a great album. Think The Clash’s London Calling, Nirvana’s Nevermind, or Dark Side of The Moon by Pink Floyd. Timeless and classic, there aren’t very many of them, and you won’t really know for years.

Posted by Kyle at 04:12 AM | Category: Lyrical Fun


Comments